Category Archives: Science Communication in Action

Brighten Up, There’s a Super Moon…


This week I’ve been told that my services as a freelance science news journalist were no longer needed for a science news outlet. I hadn’t been writing for them for several months because I was dealing with the aftermath of my grandfather’s death at the beginning of this year while juggling a full-time university study load. No big deal I suppose. I will even ignore being told that I could take all the time I needed. I really should have gotten that one in writing. I am living off cash reserves saved from working last year and can get through until December on $1000 a month. Lesson learned.

You know what people have been telling me this week over and over? That I should, “Brighten up because another opportunity will come along…”. If you are that opportunity, contact me. Really.

Where was I? Oh yes, “Brighten up…”. It was with much eye rolling when I happened across News.com.au’s, (not a news outlet I have ever contributed any science article too and probably won’t ever because I’m critical of their “science coverage”) take on the super moon of 2013, “Brighten up, the super moon is on the way“. The journalist interviewed an astrologer for details of the astronomical event.

What’s the big deal? An astrologer isn’t a scientist. Astrology is a set of beliefs that astronomical events can explain world events. Yup. Events that happen so far away that the distances are measured in light years. One light year is equivalent to 9,460,730,472,580.8 km. That is, very very, very, VERY far away from Earth. Put it this way, it’s like believing an aphid feeding on the sap of rose bushes in the front yard will directly cause rain falling  on a drought-ridden farm that grows your favourite food 1000km away.

James Byrne of Disease Prone fame created a breakdown analysis of News.com.au’s 2013 attempt at reporting on the super moon complete with graphs, (language warning).

Science Journalism: Doing it wrong

The journalists, (it required two journalists to write this article), did not interview an astronomer. An astronomer is a scientist who studies galaxies, stars, nebulae, gamma ray bursts, planets, and any other major body that makes up the universe that I have forgotten. They look at how these parts of the universe interact with one another. I have read of astronomical research that does link astronomical events to the daily activities on Earth. They include, an extinction event and tracking near earth objects, (it was just three months ago when a meteor broke up over Russia), to name two bits of ongoing research.

I don’t know who you would rather trust to talk about the universe. Someone who can provide evidence by studying and observing physical events around them or someone who links random events to the placement of celestial bodies in the skies. If this is what gets passed off as science journalism in Australia then perhaps it is a good thing I lost my freelance writing gig earlier this week.

On the bright side, it’s Friday so there’s nothing else that can go wrong for me this week. It can wait for next week.

1 Comment

Filed under Opinionated Orations, Science Communication in Action, So Incredibly Lame

Chemistry explosions are all bang and no buck


I am a chemist and I am heavily involved in science outreach especially in chemistry. I have built a library of demonstrations that I can pull out to demonstrate scientific principles. I also have an array of demonstrations that result in an explosion, not something to brag about when needing to board a flight. The explosions and flames are my least called upon demonstrations. I loathe these demonstrations and use them sparingly. Chemistry is so much more than pyrotechnics and it is an incredible tragedy that this is what it has become to not just people outside of science but also within science. As a chemist of 10 years, I have not once used an explosion in any of my work.

Well meaning science communicators and chemists have used them to grab the attention and awe from audiences in chemistry talks and demonstrations for who knows how long. I have seen too many to count in many guises and for a range of audiences, and all with the intention of telling people about the chemistry of matter. The bits that make up stuff around us and the chemical  reactions of the bits. This mode of chemistry outreach is a dismal failure at representing chemistry and inspiring future scientists. I say this because the vast majority of people whose only exposure to chemistry is demonstrations sum up chemistry with one word, “explosions”. Even students who have yet to step into a chemistry class will say this and then lament about the lack of explosions.

Chemistry isn’t a study of pyrotechnics. I may know the chemical components of what is needed in a firework and the chemical compounds in a number of explosives but I don’t know the first thing about firing them safely. I’m not a pyrotechnician. There needs to be an overhaul of chemistry demonstrations that are trotted out on stage before a switched on public. Let’s face it, people who turn up at these are already interested so they’re not a hostile audience. It’s time they got more than a scaled down fireworks display.

Instead of trying to design a show that encompasses the whole of chemistry, I think shows should focus on aspects of chemistry. This would mean a greater variety of demonstrations, (we’ve got the equipment so let’s flaunt it), and a better representation of what chemistry is and more importantly how pervasive it is throughout science and everyday life. Let’s see more chemistry shows with themes and targeted messages beyond, “Chemistry is awesome and exciting!”.

There are demonstrations involving dry ice beyond placing it in a bottle or an old 35mm film cannister and waiting for a big bang. Yes gases expand and this is an excellent demonstration but given that CO2 is now a much talked about gas, there is opportunity to show people some of its other properties. You could collect CO2 and pour it over a flame to demonstrate the fluidity of gases. It also shows that it doesn’t support combustion and the principle behind COfire extinguishers. Get an empty aquarium, throw in pellets of CO2 and blow bubbles into it and voila, floating bubbles.

Then of course there is the visual demonstration of bubbling CO2 through a solution to change the pH of a solution. The acidification of oceans has entered mainstream media reporting so why not get a sample of ocean water and experiment before a live audience? And with the advent of cheap webcams and livestreaming, leave a shell in acidified ocean water for the audience to monitor over time after the show to see what happens. Chemistry isn’t confined to laboratories and shows so why not encourage ongoing discussion?

Why not bring in some analytical instruments to analyse samples? There are so many handheld devices now and if you have access to them, show them off in action. I attended an open day at a chemical analytical lab and the most popular and busy stalls had working handheld devices. Bring it in and analyse something live in front of an audience in a themed show. Ask the audience for an everyday object they have on them and tie it into the show.

One of the most awe inspiring demonstrations I have seen did not have one explosion. It was a colour show showing off chemiluminescence accompanied with an informative talk. You know that CSI trick where they spray a bottle in a crime scene and then shine a UV light and suddenly the blood splatter can be seen? The chemists behind this talk took that right out of CSI, put it in front of the audience, and showed just how bright luminol can get and with more colour. It no longer remained in the domain of television magic. The speakers did finish off with an explosion but what everyone was talking about after was the much more complicated chemical reactions behind chemiluminescence.

This kind of discussion only comes if the chemistry has content beyond the flashes of light and colour. Content is king. Chemists are not magicians or performers in white lab coats. Every chemist I talk to has a story of intrigue and mystery about their work, and not just the forensic chemists. Each one of us has a mystery to solve and who doesn’t love a good detective story? Why don’t these stories get shared and in doing so shed the snap, crackle and pop impression of chemistry? After all, it’s not the study of a breakfast cereal.

I am not saying do away with explosions entirely but if it means that the rest of the chemistry show talk can’t stand alone without them, then what is the point? Demonstrations should highlight the content and show off the chemistry. No smoke, no mirrors, just the revealing of chemistry in everyday life which in itself is magical. Give people something to walk away with a real story of chemistry instead of memories of a big bang and no buck.

11 Comments

Filed under Life Observations, Opinionated Orations, Science, Science Communication in Action

We HAVE to Evacuate NOW!


  1. Last night before heading off to bed, I glanced at my Twitter feed to see what the other side of the world was chatting about when it came to science. After all, it was Valentine’s Day and a myriad of science news stories about the reproduction habits of animals other than humans were making headlines. I even found an economical analysis on the production of single stem roses.

    I found @Chemjobber, @SeeArrOh, and @DrRubidium chatting about the five most dangerous English words. Their examples were ones that I had heard while working as a scientist. Chaos ensued after five words were carelessly strung together.
  2. .@Chemjobber “what’s the worst that’ll happen?” #dangerous5
  3. I added my own tweet.
  4. Then things just grew…
  5. I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve had this exchange in the lab
  6. Then I made this innocent tweet.
  7. If you liked #overlyhonestmethods, check out #dangerous5. Five most dreaded words strung together in a lab.
  8. Scientists were chiming in from all over the place with their own #dangerous5 and I thought it would be great to commiserate. My #dangerous5 tweets were things that really did set off a chain of events. Some of them frightening.
  9. Unfortunately they didn’t know what they were doing. They were also winging it. Just 30 seconds after that declaration I experienced my first lab accident in my third year undergraduate lab session. It was serious. I copped a lungful of concentrated sulphuric acid fumes. It was awful.

    The person had placed a stopper on the end of his reflux column during a digest. You NEVER do this. Ever. Expanding gases need somewhere to go otherwise pressure builds up.
  10. If you have to ask this, you really shouldn’t be doing chemistry. Or cook.
  11. .@Chemjobber “Is this the right colour?” Especially worrying when there isn’t supposed to be a colour. #dangerous5
  12. I left a trainee to make up a standard solution of 0.05M hydrochloric acid. They had a degree in chemistry. Next thing I knew they were coming to me with a volumetric flask that was lurid yellow. I have no idea what happened. I do know that I ended up making the standard solution and put in a formal request that the trainee be sent to another department because their basics weren’t up to scratch.
  13. Never add a little more of anything especially to a superheated liquid. Ever. Hot liquid and gas goes everywhere and it burns. A lot. And that’s just water. When it’s a chemical, burns are much much worse.
  14. The bane of my existence. I label every beaker with permanent marker before use. Unfortunately not everyone labels glassware and some people think that while I’m focussed on my tasks, I know exactly what they’re doing as well. Well I don’t.

    Just as I was about to suggest using a bit of litmus paper to check, this bright spark decided to sniff their beakers. You don’t sniff in chemistry. You waft. Always waft. They got a noseful of acid fume and promptly dropped the beaker of acid onto the bench where some fairly expensive electronics were sitting.
  15. This introduction
  16. followed by this description of me
  17. has always negatively impacted my productivity and positively impacted on blood pressure, stress, and worst of all, levels of paperwork.
  18. This was said to me by someone who had taken it upon themselves to delete a method, (program to tell instruments what to do and when), from an analytical instrument without consulting anyone. Turn around time increased significantly and it was the first time I heard my then mild mannered supervisor swear.
  19. In a lab you get used to a certain level of smell. You live with it just so long as extraction hoods are working and there isn’t a catastrophe in progress. So when someone asks,
  20. Pay attention especially if they’ve been around longer than you in the lab because the next question could turn into,
  21. What had happened was that the hose carrying water in a distillation set up was touching the same spot providing heat. It had melted and water was being diverted to live electrical cables. It shorted. Spectacularly. The building was evacuated.
  22. There’s this thing about cyanide gas. It smells of almonds or at least that’s what I’ve been told. I’ve never been able to verify it even though I’ve worked extensively in gold analysis. Through a quirk of genetics, I can’t smell it. I need to rely on gas monitors, working fumehoods, and people not to pour acid waste into cyanide waste.

    I continued working in away until my supervisor who had forgotten his sunglasses came in. He swung into action and barked at me,
  23. Thankfully no damage done. I was made to sit outside in fresh air and given the rest of the day off after a medical check up. I was shaken for weeks after the incident because all the failsafes hadn’t triggered.
  24. “Did anyone else feel that?” (in reference to unexpected tremors & earthquakes) #dangerous5
  25. I worked in one lab that was literally down the road from the minesite. It remains as one of the favourite labs I’ve ever had the privilege to be part of. I didn’t believe that the working mine was just over there until I was knocked off my feet by a particularly large blast.

    Who would place a working laboratory with chemicals and expensive instrumentation so close? It doesn’t make sense, that is unless it’s decided to mine closer to the lab. The lab has since been moved.
  26. The person who said this received urgent first aid from me 5 minutes after. They got concentrated nitric acid in their eye. They cried like a baby. I got the task of filing paperwork.
  27. Wrong. There are a myriad of gloves made of different materials because they react and behave differently to various chemicals in the lab. That’s why there’s also often a glove safety chart to help out with choosing the right glove. Not everything is catered for sensitive skin and allergies.
  28. Said in the same lab to me. I became unemployed soon after. In retrospect, I should have taken the first statement as a warning. Lesson learned. I also promised to never work in academia again.
  29. Always, and I mean always ask to see what duct tape is being applied to. It could be to substitute glassware joins which is not a good idea. Some improvisations are never meant to be.
  30. Every experiment needs looking after. Every. Single. One.
  31. No other phrases can send chill the lab so efficiently. Think of your very worst rental inspection and then multiply it by a million. That comes close to the dread I felt every time I heard that there would be visitors.

    Every single one of them would expect an immaculate shiny lab with the latest gadgets as seen the previous night on CSI. I would have to be dressed in a lab coat even though uniform dictates that I wear other apparel in place of a lab coat. The problem was that I essentially worked with dirt. Ok, mineral samples for various metals but essentially they look like powdered dirt. The machines used for analysis don’t need to be the latest shiny instrument on the market so often they weren’t the top model.
    Total let down. Even worse was when they didn’t see an explosion. What am I? A magician?
  32. Unfortunately science has a lot of measuring. That in itself involves numbers. This is well before any statistical analysis needs doing.

    If you’ve never sat through the night and greeted dawn by the light of a monitor rectifying incorrect data analysis before a deadline that can’t be missed, consider yourself lucky. There is nothing more stressful and rage inducing.
  33. No. You’re in a lab. You do not head to Wikipedia. You know eight year olds can be editors right? You need to head to a science journal where scientists in your field are publishing their work. You know, the people who know stuff.
  34. This could lead to you spending hours (re)organising your reference library or it could mean you found a plagiarised journal article. The latter is less likely but it does happen resulting in headaches and embarrassing retractions.

1 Comment

Filed under Awesomeness, Life Observations, Science Communication in Action, The Weird World of the Web

What’s Your Science Story?


Science Jamboree

Science Jamboree (Photo credit: Raven Photographic)

Way back in September I had a conversation with Ben Lillie, a writer for TED and director/producer of The Story Collider, a delightful podcast about the human stories behind science. I adore it because it brings forth the different kinds of people who work in and around science. It’s one of the mainstays in my podcast subscriptions because I have a fascination with how people got into science.

We spoke about science stories. I love reading them. I get paid to write science news. However I struggle with the most important science story of all – my own. I am invited to classrooms and science outreach events to tell my story by people who have painstakingly put some pieces of the jigsaw together that fit in with their needs. I don’t mind at all if parts of my story resonates but what about all of it?

I suppose this has been what I have thought about since early September as I have struggled to collect my thoughts into a blog post. I am better at telling other people’s stories and events. As I have meandered through the fog of my science story over the past two months I have realised that my science story is one that needs telling and one that does inspire. More importantly I have accepted that my science story affects greatly how I do science and communicate science.

Thank you Ben Lillie. This is the blog post that I said I would write. It took me longer than expected.

I was born into a family with a non-English speaking background in an English speaking country. I grew up in small towns far away from the city, 3,500km north of it to be exact. That’s around 2200 miles away from the nearest city. This was a time before the internet reached homes. Having television reception in the home was like getting the super fast broadband today. We didn’t even have a phone in the house until I was 9 years old.

I will never be able to thank my teacher Mrs Knight enough for her patience in getting through to a stubborn four year old girl who had declared the English language to be stupid. It could not have been easy but it is because of this that I have been able to take part in learning at school. Looking back on my early school reports, I did not show much promise. I was average in most things and at the beginning, I was below average in reading and numeracy skills.

Given this start in life, the odds are stacked against me to finish school and head to university, let alone become a scientist.

This is where my parents came to the fore. My dad when he wasn’t working night shift would always be reading something, newspapers, magazines and maps. My mum always had a recipe book around and was always jotting things down as she worked out how to prepare an authentic Singaporean dish with limited variety of ingredients. The nearest Asian Grocer was 3500km away. They always made sure I finished my reading homework which was to read aloud from a book no matter how much I hated it.

I remember when I asked my dad what he was reading in the newspaper. Instead of summarising, he would read snippets of the newspaper to me. I suspect he read the parts that would interest me because I always found it fascinating what people around the world got up to when all I did was to go to school. Gradually I progressed to reading the newspaper by myself and discovering books.

As this is a moment of being truthful, I will admit to loathing science in primary school, all seven years of it. I never found it fun. It was hard. I despised science. There were unpronounceable words. It was something for the smart kids. I never got selected to be in accelerated science programs. Science in primary school made me feel dumb and it was something I had to work really hard at. Teachers assuming me to be naturally brilliant or to be quite dull in science compounded the issue.

At some point during the last few years of primary school, I became aware that my grandfather with minimal English skills had enrolled in a formal horticultural course. He explained that he wanted to learn how to grow plants well and wasn’t interested in the exams or qualifications. He wanted to learn to do something in his life better. This has always stayed in my mind. It’s possible to study and learn for pleasure. I didn’t realise that this would become a life defining moment for me.

I started to add popular science books to my reading choices. Books that had been written so that the science was easy to understand that I could read at my own pace and stop to look up words in a dictionary. I was able to explore pieces of the scientific world. I was lucky to have parents who let me read and emphasised the preciousness of education even though all I was concerned with was doing well enough to stay with my friends.

It was a heavily pregnant woman who encouraged me to explore science and made me feel confident enough to take risks and make mistakes in science to learn from. Hell, it was even okay to mispronounce scientific terms so long as you learned what they meant and pronounced them correctly the next time. Sniggering and exasperated looks were replaced with patience and enthusiasm. She was my Year 8 science teacher. I do not know what my life would have turned out had I not been in that class. It was in that class I discovered what parts of science were fun for me.

From that first day in that science class, I haven’t stopped taking risks in science to do new things. I may not have any sort of award to show for my work in science or have a paper in a prestigious scientific journal that only a few will read. I have something that no one can take away from me. I have a sense of enjoyment in science that I share freely. I come from a background where people have shared their knowledge and sense of fun. This has shaped who I am and how I do things.

I get frustrated with myself if I am unable to explain a concept to someone who is desperately trying to understand. I will make the time to explain it in as many ways as possible and when that doesn’t work, I seek help. If I am not of any help in the learning process than at the very least I can facilitate it. This sharing of information isn’t limited to classrooms and lessons. This happens in workplaces and laboratories. Learning new things is vital to achieving goals, especially the difficult ones.

I have a firm belief that part of doing science is communicating scientific work to everyone and anyone who may be interested. That communication should also be open and inviting. The effect of scientific work is not confined to the hallowed halls and rooms of research institutions. It impacts upon every part of everyday life.

As I have come to grips with my personal science story, I have become ever more thoughtful in my approach in science communication whether it be in science outreach or talking about a science topic with friends. In recognising where my approach and thoughts have developed from, I have become much better about talking about science because I know why I keep talking.

I want people to have fun with me.

What’s your science story?

Leave a Comment

Filed under Life Observations, Science, Science Communication in Action

WA Science Awards 2012


On Thursday night, I attended the 2012 Western Australia Science Awards Gala Dinner where the top scientists, science educators and science communicators are recognised. I was lucky to receive an invitation from the WA Department of Commerce to attend as a science blogger and also as the President of the WA Branch of the Australian Science Communicators.

The dinner was held in the Astral Ballroom at Crown Perth and it was beautifully decorated. There was even a red carpet leading to the stage to walk on. It was clear from the onset that the science community of Western Australia was the star attraction.

The Red Carpet – Photo: The Scene Team

And there was even a little jazz throughout the night.

Live Band – Photo: The Scene Team

To complete the celebratory occasion, there was also a WA Science Awards wall to stand in front of to have photos taken. It was quite possibly my most favourite discovery of the night. I delighted in the opportunity to be in front of it.

WA Chief Scientist Prof Lyn Beazley and I – Photo: The Scene Team

The MC of the events was Ruben Meerman, The Surfing Scientist. He was affable, funny, and knew his audience. There is talent in eliciting genuine laughter for science jokes from a room of scientists.

Ruben Meerman, Photo: The Scene Team

What I did like this year at the WA Science Awards was the emphasis on science engagement and science communication and that was where the awards of the night began.

Educator of the Year: Mrs Mady (Marion) Colquhoun (Armadale) – Science Specialist Teacher, Armadale Primary School with Science and Innovation Minister John Day Photo: The Scene Team

Science Ambassador of the Year: Professor Steven Tingay – Director, Curtin Institute of Radio Astronomy and Deputy Director, International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research with Science and Innovation Minister John Day, Photo: The Scene Team

I especially liked the comment made during the awarding of these awards, “What is the point of doing fantastic science if we tell no one about it?”. I have yet to hear strong arguments for staying silent about science. This is the stuff that can change lives. It rankles me when science news is left out of mainstream news unless there are centimetres to fill on a page of the newspaper or a sudden silence to fill on air. We can have nightly finance and sport news  presented with aplomb, enthusiasm and jargon but we can’t have nightly science news but yet we tell ourselves that science is important for the future and we should encourage a new generation of scientists.

Engineers without Borders High School Outreach Program won the next award, Science Engagement Initiative of the Year. This program has been developed by the WA Chapter of Engineers without Borders. It aims to improve students’ understanding of climate change, sustainability and technology. In addition to this, the program is used as an assessment tool for university engineering students and allows working engineers to become involved and use it as a professional development opportunity. Any engineers reading this should really look this up and break the stereotype of the socially awkward engineer.

Science Engagement Initiative of the Year: Engineers without Borders High School Outreach Program with Science and Innovation Minister John Day, Photo: The Scene Team

Western Australia’s Student Scientist of the Year went to UWA PhD student Mr David Erceg-Hurn whose research is evaluating strategies used to reduce stigma surrounding seeking professional help and treatment for clinical depression. He has also evaluated programs designed to reduce drug and alcohol misuse. The announcement of this award was beautifully and coincidentally timed with Australia’s national Mental Health Week.

Student Scientist of the Year: Mr David Erceg-Hurn – Master of Clinical Psychology / PhD Student, UWA with Science and Innovation Minister John Day, Photo: The Scene Team

Australian Research Fellow, UWA Associate Professor Ajmal Mian was awarded Early Career Scientist of the Year for his pioneering research on 3D face and object recognition for a wide range of multidisciplinary applications.

Early Career Scientist of the Year: Associate Professor Ajmal Mian – Australian Research Fellow, UWA with Science and Innovation Minister John Day, Photo: The Scene Team

Professor Stephen Hopper AC FLS FTSE who recently served as the Director of the Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew was inducted into the Science Hall of Fame. Prof Hopper is a plant conservation biologist who has contributed significantly to preserving biodiversity in Western Australia as well as improving conservation programs and infrastructure within the state. He has also been named a Companion of Order of Australia for his service as a global science leader.

Science Hall of Fame Inductee: Professor Stephen Hopper AC FLS FTSE with WA Premier Colin Barnett, Photo: The Scene Team

The Scientist of the Year award went to the Director for International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research, Professor Peter Quinn. Prof Quinn is an astrophysicist whose area of specialty is galaxy formation and dark matter. He does this using large astronomical facilities and supercomputers. In recent times, his efforts in developing WA’s radio astronomy capabilities have been central in the success of the Australian Square Kilometre Array Telescope campaign.

Unfortunately Prof Quinn had to be in Germany on the night of the WA Science Awards but he was able to Skype in his acceptance speech. It was such a lovely and warm touch to the evening.

Scientist of the Year: Professor Peter Quinn – Director, International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research on Skype at the 2012 WA Science Awards, Photo: The Scene Team

It was a great night out celebrating the very best science in Western Australia. There is an incredible depth and breadth of scientific research happening in the state. In a state dominated by the mining industry, I noted that not one award was mining related. I am constantly stating that there is much more to science in Western Australia than mining technologies and the 2012 WA Science Awards has epitomised that this year.

For more photos of the gorgeous night, I have created an album on my Facebook page that is publicly available so no account needed.

1 Comment

Filed under Awesomeness, Science, Science Communication in Action